A Conversation on Collaboration

Michael Hawes: In an interview with Fulbright Canada, Killam Fellow Christina Pierpaoli and Fulbright Scholar Dr. Charles Emlet discuss their passion for their discipline, their decision to collaborate, and the importance of the student-mentor relationship. The Fulbright Program aims to provide an opportunity for impassioned students and scholars to exchange ideas, and to collaborate on leading edge research projects. Learning of this collaboration, and the crossover of these two programs, the Killam Fellowships Program for undergraduate students and the Fulbright Scholar Program, has been extremely exciting. We are proud to have students and scholars like Christina and Charles as our grantees and alumni.

                                                                                                                                                 

Killam Fellow Christina Pierpaoli and Fulbright Scholar Dr. Charles Emlet

Killam Fellow Christina Pierpaoli and
Fulbright Scholar Dr. Charles Emlet

Christina: I recently had the opportunity to study Italian literature in Urbino, Italy for six weeks on scholarship from Rutgers University. In my brief, but infinitely rewarding exchanges with older Italians there, who ambled daily along the countryside and laughed heartily, I was taken with a curiosity to understand relative differences in healthy longevity. At present, I am a Killam Fellow at the University of Toronto, under the auspices of Fulbright Canada, where I am examining dimensions of aging and cognition. Particularly exciting has been my collaboration with Principal Investigator and Fulbright Scholar Dr. Charles Emlet.

Charles: I am Professor of Social Work from the University of Washington, Tacoma. For my Fulbright award, I went on exchange to McMaster University to understand the lived experiences of older adults living with HIV in Ontario through in-depth interviews. I have always had a passion for gerontology, and this opportunity has given me a chance to further my existing research on aging and HIV with Canadian colleagues, and get a better grasp of how people “age well” with HIV. In reading the profiles of Fulbright Scholars and Killam Fellows at the Fulbright Canada Fall Orientation, I noticed another person that indicated an interest in gerontology. While we were waiting for commencement of the Killam lecture, I approached Christina and inquired about her interest in aging and gerontology. This conversation was revisited over lunch at the Canadian War Museum.

Christina: I was excited to meet the Fulbright scholars as I have a reverence for academia, knowledge, and curiosity. That, for me, is the essence of a Fulbright scholar.  Having quickly learned how genuinely accommodating and approachable the scholars were, I developed a comfort in our discussions.  I found myself talking (complaining) to Dr. Emlet about the dearth of undergraduate research opportunities in aging and life span development. I cited the work of my independent studies and goals for my time at the University of Toronto, where opportunities in academic gerontology seemed comparatively robust, when he mentioned the qualitative research in aging and HIV he would be conducting there during the time of my exchange.

Charles: I suggested we might get together and discuss how she could be involved in my Fulbright research project. We met again after I had been in Ontario for about a week and outlined some of the things she would like to learn from the experiences of a qualitative research project.

Christina: Dr. Emlet and I maintained a dialogue over email until the time of our exchange in January.  I found myself overwhelmed with an eagerness to be in Toronto and begin our exploration of this inquiry.

Charles: The project is a qualitative study, involving 30 in-depth interviews with adults age 50 and over who are HIV+ and aging successfully. The goal is to learn about personal, social and environmental characteristics that assist them in successful aging to see if some of those traits or strategies could be transferred to others. We are finding that there are many older adults who have lived with HIV disease for a long time and are doing quite well. They seem generally excited to share their stories.

Christina: Particularly fascinating about Dr. Emlet’s research are the populations inherent to it. His work seeks to capture and honour the experiences of two historically disenfranchised groups with whom I hope to work clinically in my continued studies of psychology and aging.  The emerging stories of HIV positive elderly had until now, remained relatively unknown.

Charles: I have spent a considerable amount of time studying and working with older HIV+ adults throughout my career. I began working in the field of HIV in 1987 when everybody was dying. I ran an AIDS Home Care project in northern California for 12 years. Since coming to academia, this has been the major focus of my research. Originally focusing on stigma and discrimination, I have recently begun looking at the “positive side” (pun intended) of living with HIV. Older adults are becoming newly infected but many have been living with HIV for 20, 25 or 30 years; to figure out how and why they are doing well, and to witness their stories in an honour. There is almost no research on resilience among older HIV positive adults, so this is very new and exciting territory.

Christina: With Dr. Emlet’s guidance, I hope to improve my qualitative data analysis and interviewing skills. Dr. Emlet is one of the best listeners to whom I have ever had the privilege of talking, and I look forward to refining that highly sophisticated, but grossly underappreciated skill. I have already learned so much! Particularly exciting has been my role in observing and partially facilitating qualitative interviews; having the privilege to hear intimate and inspiring accounts of resilience overwhelms me with gratitude for Dr. Emlet’s mentorship, and also engenders excitement for my prospective clinical work.  In listening to their stories, I am reminded of the silence of human strength and suffering, and I am reminded that everyone has a story.  This has been a humbling exercise.

Charles: I have involved undergrads in my research on several previous occasions. I love the excitement and enthusiasm that they bring, and Christina is no exception. She is so engaged and excited about gerontology in general and this project in particular. Christina brings fresh eyes and lots of questions to the process. She will often ask questions about how or why something is being done which makes me think. Having her come from what the Zen teacher Shunryu Suzuki, called “beginners mind” is very helpful. When something is new to you it is never approached in a rote way. I really am enjoying her inquisitive and questioning nature. 

Christina: I am honoured to work alongside Dr. Emlet, whose work has contributed so meaningfully to the lives of older adults and the HIV community, and continues to inspire students like myself, who are interested in those empirically underrepresented populations.  Working with impassioned educators and scholars like Dr. Emlet reinforces my passion for knowledge, education, and research. Being a mentee has affirmed my competence as a producer of knowledge- not merely a consumer of it.

Charles: The student and the professor learn from one another. The professor needs to come in with an idea of learning as well as the student. In this project, we are learning about how people live well and age successfully with HIV disease. They are the experts in this not me. So as Christina and I collaborate, we learn together from the people being interviewed. We learn what works for them and why. Maybe we learn enough to begin to create some potential interventions for those not doing so well. We have a three way team in some way, researcher, student and participant. The relationship is important for a couple reasons. I am a social worker and as such often have difficulty getting students to understand the importance of research and its impact on social work practice. So by entering into a student-scholar relationship the student can hopefully see – first hand – its value. On another level, part of our job as scholars is to mentor and bring up the next generation of researchers. In this case Gerontological researchers. Through this relationship you can pass the baton, so to speak, about researching important issues in aging and gerontology. Christina is very committed to gerontology, which is great, now we just need to work on the HIV part.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Donkey Sanctuary

Print
On a very cold and snowy day in the last week of January, I traveled to The Donkey Sanctuary of Canada in Guelph, Ontario.  This Sanctuary was founded in 1992 as a refuge for donkeys, mules, and hinnies that are neglected, abused, or can no longer be cared for by their owners.  Set on 100 acres of picturesque rolling fields, wetlands, and walking trails, the Sanctuary is a tranquil place to visit, and is open to the public from May to October.   I was warmly welcomed by executive director Katharin Harkins, and toured around by Lee, the education director.  After the tour, and once acclimated to the layout, I took out my camera and began filming.

I’m now in the early stages of a feature documentary that poetically illustrates the daily life of a donkey.  The hope is to illustrate mankind’s relationship to this forgotten animal and the care that goes into rehabilitating them after the remarkable abuses they have endured.  The film includes footage in Guelph, as well as places in Europe.  My camera captured the small moments of intimacy between the donkeys, the employees who care for their everyday needs, and the elderly who see the donkey when the donkeys are brought on visits to retirement homes.  Interestingly enough, the donkeys are as curious about me (and the camera) as I am of them.  Their curiosity, intelligence and personalities are visually captivating.  If you have a moment, visit the Donkey Sanctuary of Canada website, or if you live near Guelph, go and check it out for yourself!

Website: http://www.thedonkeysanctuary.ca/

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Donkey-Sanctuary-of-Canada/120101861347541

 _____________________________________________________________

Ashley Sabin 2012-13 Fulbright scholar

Ashley Sabin
2012-13 Fulbright scholar

Ashley Sabin is a 2012-13 Fulbright student who went on exchange to Concordia University. Ashley’s interest is in nonfiction documentary storytelling.  Along with her partner, David Redmon, she has produced, directed, edited, and photographed six films: Mardi Gras: Made in China (2005), Kamp Katrina (2007), Intimidad (2008), Invisible Girlfriend (2009), Girl Model (2012), and Downeast (2012).  Mardi Gras: Made in China was nominated for the Grand Jury Prize at the Sundance Film Festival. Kamp Katrina and Intimidad both premiered at the Museum of Modern Art and the South by Southwest Film Festival, all of Sabin’s films have screened on domestic and international television stations. Girl Model received funding through the Sundance Institute, Cinereach, Puffin Foundation, Harvard Radcliffe Institute, and The Fledgling fund. It will air on POV, CBC, PBS and the BBC.

Girl Model is playing nationally in the United States on March 24 at 10:00 pm. http://www.pbs.org/pov/girlmodel/#.US-As46TY20

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Fulbright Connection

Fulbright Scholar Eileen Angelini

Fulbright Scholar
Eileen Angelini

I continue to be amazed by how my 2010-2011 Canada-U.S. Fulbright Award as a Visiting Research Chair in Globalization and Cultural Studies at McMaster University (Hamilton, ON) thrives and blossoms.  Most recently, on Monday, January 21, 2013, I delivered a lecture, “Une Histoire peu connue de la discrimination en Nouvelle-Angleterre:  Les Attaques du Ku Klux Klan sur les Franco-Américains lors de la première moitié du 20ème siècle,” at the Royal Military College of Canada (RMCC) at the invitation of fellow Fulbrighter, Joel J. Sokolsky, Principal of RMCC, and Mr. Jean Lamarre of the History Department who has written extensively on the Francophone presence in the United States.  Joel and I met for the first time in October 2011 when we were both presenters at the U.S.-Canada Exchange Alumni Symposium, Partners, Allies, Friends:  U.S.-Canada Relations in Focus in Ottawa.

RMCC (www.rmc.ca) is a unit of the Canadian Forces (CF) responsible for the professional military development and education of Officer Cadets and as an accredited university under the laws of the Province of Ontario, also serves the broader educational and research interests of the Department of National Defense (DND) through its graduate programs (which are open to civilian students), continual learning division and research activities.  It is a bilingual institution operating in French and English and which offers all its undergraduate programs in both languages. Its motto is Truth, Duty, Valour and its mission is to produce “officers well educated.”  Imagine my delight when Joel presented me with a copy of Lieutenant-Colonel Peter N. Dawe’s Truth•Duty•Valor:  Serving Canada Since 1876/Vérité•Devoir•Vaillance:  Au Service du Canada depuis 1876, a beautifully illustrated history of RMCC.

The beauty in the on-going development of these Fulbright connections lies in the fact that each party’s point of view is cultivated and enhanced by each other’s perspective.  For example, the focus of my Fulbright Award was the exploration of the Francophone populations of North America.  As traditional French textbooks, particularly ones geared for the introductory level, rarely dedicate more than one chapter to Quebec and even less to Canada’s other French-speaking regions and to the Franco-American communities in the United States, I was particularly keen on researching the history and culture of the Francophone populations of North American so as to make the study of French more relevant to my students at Canisius College.  As Canisius is located in Buffalo, NY, I have the added benefit that, on average, one-third of my students are Canadian with an additional handful from Haiti and Louisiana.  Thus, my classes definitely have a more cross-border focus than one would normally expect from a college-level French course.

My lecture at RMCC, delivered in French in historic Currie Hall, to Officer Cadets and faculty, detailed the following:  Un aperçu historique concis de la connexion française entre le Canada et la Nouvelle-Angleterre avec une attention particulière au documentaire de Ben Levine, Réveil – Waking Up French: The Repression and Renaissance of the French in New Englandet un accent particulier sur le KKK en Nouvelle-Angleterre.  Referring to my Fulbright article, “New England and Canada:  Understanding the Language, Cultural, and Historical Connections,”published at <www.toutcanadien.com>, I explained:

“En 1900, la population du Québec avait considérablement augmenté. Toutefois, cette vaste population grevait désormais les terres agricoles disponibles. Dans le même temps, la Nouvelle-Angleterre exploitait le pouvoir hydraulique de grands fleuves pour des usines de textile de plus en plus larges qui avaient besoin de travailleurs. Un flot de plus d’un million de Québécois français catholiques est tombé du Québec dans des villes de Nouvelle-Angleterre en grande partie anglaises protestantes, crééant autant de petits Canadas, des banlieues françaises, à tel point que la Nouvelle-Angleterre était appelée Québec en Sud, “Lower Québec.”

Contrairement aux immigrants européens de la même période, ces Québécois vivaient à peine un jour de voyage en train de leur destination et voulaient uniquement rester assez longtemps pour économiser une somme d’argent suffisante pour revenir au Québec et redémarrer leurs fermes et recommencer les modes de vie qu’ils avaient laissés derrière eux. Ils étaient extrêmement fidèles à leur mode de vie français et catholique, qui soulignait la communauté, la coopération et la dévotion plutôt que la vie individuelle, compétitive, et matérialiste répandue aux États-Unis. Ils étaient si fidèles à leur mode de vie français et catholique qu’ils ont maintenu leur culture en dépit de nombreux obstacles.

Pourtant, les villes anglaises protestantes ont pris peur de cet afflux de gens qui parlaient une langue différente et pratiquaient une religion différente. Ils ont blâmé les prêtres pour encourager les Québécois à ne pas s’intégrer, de ne pas apprendre l’anglais. Dans les villes partout en Nouvelle-Angleterre la tension montait. Des élites protestantes parlant anglais ont formé des branches du Ku Klux Klan, menacé et attaqué de nombreuses collectivités françaises du Massachusetts au Maine. Bénéficiant d’un nombre plus large que dans le sud du pays, les membres du Klan dans la Nouvelle-Angleterre étaient puissants et bien établis. Parmi plusieurs membres qui ont servi en tant que leaders civiques, l’un a été élu gouverneur du Maine. Le KKK de la Nouvelle-Angleterre a même eu un auxiliaire pour les femmes!

The ensuing discussion was highly enriching as one attendee asked me if a Franco-American defined him/herself by his/her language or by his/her cultural heritage.  As I am of Acadian, Native American, and Irish descent on my mother’s side and of Italian descent on my father’s side, I needed a moment to reflect since I felt I also had a bias as a Professor of French.  So I offered that even though Franco-Americans had lost their language, they had not lost their culture steeped in the Catholic faith whereas Quebeccers had safeguarded their language but lost their faith.  The discussion then centered on other immigrant groups to the United States and how that even though the transfer of the native language from one generation to another is thwarted by the predominance of the use of English in the United States, these groups steadfastly identify themselves by their cultural heritage so much so than when there was the huge influx of Quebeccers to New England in the 1920s to work in the textile mills, they were viewed with much trepidation by not only Protestant groups but by Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans (especially when the Quebeccers would cross picket lines and work for the lowest wages).  After my lecture, Joel spoke to the relevance of the immigrant discussion and then graciously offered to have me back to RMCC to present my Fulbright project on the Acadians and Cajuns.

Eileen M. Angelini, Ph.D.
Professor of French and Chevalier dans l’Ordre des Palmes Académiques
Department of Modern Languages, Literatures, and Cultures
Canisius College
2001 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14208-1098
Tel:  (716) 888-2829, Fax:  (716) 888-3268
E-mail:  eileen.angelini@canisius.edu

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Breaking from Books—Social Capital, Community and the Holidays

Standing in the middle of 15, 000 people on Ottawa’s historic Sparks street, radio in hand, the crowd drowning out the voices in my earpiece and unable to move, I was beginning to feel a little in over my head. It was mid-November when the Sparks Street Mall Business Improvement Area asked if I would help them organize Canada’s first ever Times Square-style New Year’s Eve party. It would feature a live DJ, Juno-Award winning headliner the Arkells, and a ball drop–all on Sparks street, in the heart of the capital’s corporate sector, just blocks from Parliament Hill and the same place where Thomas D’Arcy McGee, Father of Confederation, Member of Parliament and Federal Cabinet Minister, was assassinated in April 1868. The idea had been floating around since July, but like any well-organized festival, getting approval from, you guessed it – all three levels of government – can be daunting.

The motivation for this free, public night out was simple. We were a group of young professionals who wanted to showcase our city – Ottawa, as so much more than just a hub for politics and government. We were tired of getting sidestepped and written off as incapable of fun by our fellow Canadians. My colleagues, a combination of public relations practitioners and special events planners, chose a very public mechanism to make this bold statement and dispel the myths. In doing so, they were in familiar territory. I, on the other hand, a policy student at Carleton University’s Arthur Kroeger College of Public Affairs, with a background in non-profit organization management, research and public service was, admittedly, out of my element.

Although nervous, I was excited to undertake this new challenge. I often struggle with the somewhat solitary day-to-day tasks associated with being an undergraduate student, as most of them occur at a desk in front of a computer. I thrive off hands-on experiences that involve high levels of interaction with others, so I jumped at the opportunity to develop a volunteer strategy, put together a team, and coordinate volunteer services on New Year’s Eve.

This wasn’t the only initiative I had the chance to take part in over the holiday season. Every year, I head back to my high school, Philemon Wright, in Gatineau, Quebec, to help coordinate the Daniel Johnson Community Food Drive and Dinner – a tradition I founded in 2007 that sees teenagers organize a day of events to welcome new Canadians to the city. Watching students weave effortlessly through linguistic, cultural and social lines while defying every teenage stereotype is a definite seasonal highlight. Combined with helping to host a New Year’s party for locals in Ottawa, I couldn’t think of a better send off for my Spring exchange as a Killam Fellow at American University in Washington, D.C.

What a send off it turned out to be! By 11 pm on New Year’s Eve, it was clear that our casual street party, aimed at bringing Ottawans together to ring in 2013 exceeded the expectations and projections of every related governing body, business authority and event planner. Our goal was to attract 6,000 to 10, 000 people. Final estimates rested between 18, 000 and 20, 000 bodies at midnight. Although I don’t remember the specifics of the evening (it wasn’t the one glass of champagne, but rather the chaos, exhaustion and sheer disbelief), I have vivid images of the street coming to life with guests, not only from across Canada, but from London, France, Denmark and New York City, armed with Beavertails and hot chocolate. This ‘street party’ had quickly turned into a tourist attraction, bringing with it the standard benefits of massive crowds. Local vendors and hotels were reaping the benefits and thanking us for the exposure and traffic, while guests flattered us with kudos and gratitude for the best New Year’s Eve Ottawa has ever seen.

It wasn’t until the thousands of attendees streamed out after midnight that we began to breathe normally and communication was restored on our radios. One of the best comments I heard as everyone flooded out past me was that Ottawa felt like a real city. Not only did I get to be a part of this grand display of spirit and pride, but I got a sneak peak into a world that I would have otherwise never been exposed to, encompassing business, tourism, culture, entertainment and, yes, legislation. I also learned of the sheer commitment and dedication of local volunteers, both independent and from Ottawa’s Rotary Club, who welcomed the evening’s crowd with grace and made us all seem far more collected and coherent than we could have been.

Our once lively, bright-eyed four-person team stayed on site until 6 am before succumbing to what was, I’m sure, the best sleep we will ever have (even better than that one after finals).  Despite the sleep deprivation, we felt as though we had made our case: this level of interaction at public gatherings for the sheer purpose of celebration and social bonding is just as important as the everyday politicking and governance in Ottawa. Moreover, as a city, we are no doubt capable of pursuing and accomplishing both successfully. On a personal level, I was reminded of the importance of being open-minded, maintaining an interdisciplinary approach and diversifying my learning experiences…not only as an academic and inside the classroom, but as a life-long learner, professional and human being. These are just a few of the things the Killam Fellowships program encourages and promotes through its bi-national residential and academic exchange between Canada and the United States, as well as its emphasis on community involvement through programs such as the Killam Day of Action. I can’t wait to begin my exchange at American University and dive in to the opportunities of a new city and community, and be exposed to fresh learning experiences in and outside of the lecture hall!


Layla Farhat is a third-year undergraduate student at Carleton University’s Arthur Kroeger College of Public Affairs. She will be studying as a Killam Fellow at American University in Washington, D.C in their Departments of Government and Economics as well as the School of International Service for the Spring 2013 term. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Mixed Electoral Outcomes and the Triumph of Ideological Politics

Fazley Siddiq at the Canadian Embassy in Washington D.C.

Fazley Siddiq at the Canadian Embassy in Washington D.C.

That 1992 campaign slogan “It’s the economy, stupid” not only energized the Democratic base, it helped to unseat President Bush, the father of the 43rd president of the United States, bringing Bill Clinton to the White House, the first Democratic president in 12 years.  The 90 percent approval rating for President Bush following the successful 1991 Iraq campaign had plummeted drastically within months with voters shifting their aim on the recession mired economy as the election approached.

Twenty years later amid the deepening polarization in American politics, the pre-eminence of the economy as the primary decider in a presidential election seems questionable.  It would nonetheless be far too simplistic to say that since President Obama was re-elected despite the poor economy, the economy is no longer as critical a factor as in previous elections.  The fact remains that while he won handily not just in the count of Electoral College votes, but also in the popular vote, the margin of this victory was greatly reduced compared to 2008.  The poor state of the economy – especially rising public indebtedness, the high unemployment rate and low housing prices over a number of years – had to be an important factor for the electorate, but it was clearly not enough to reverse the final outcome.

If there has been a sea change in popular perception and if indeed Americans are not swayed as much by the economy as in the past, where lies the explanation?  It is not a phenomenon that appeared suddenly nor is it something that is at odds with core American values.  It is perhaps an evolution that has at its origin the increasing polarization of American politics and the values that elected Congressional representatives bring to Washington.

How else can one explain the intransigence over the debt ceiling?  The cut in Standard and Poor’s triple-A rating of the world’s largest economy in August 2011 was due in large measure to the inadequacy of the fiscal consolidation plan struck by Congress and the administration to stabilize the dynamics of the public debt rather than any notion of the long term fundamentals of the American economy, which remain solid.

For two elections in a row since 2010, the American people have voted for a Democratic controlled Senate while giving control of the House to the GOP on both occasions.  This has resulted in a hardening of positions on ideological grounds with the Democratic president locking horns with the GOP Speaker of the House with each frequently hurling threats at the other.  The debate over avoiding the fiscal cliff and the related issue of raising the debt ceiling has plunged the nation yet again into another home grown artificial crisis, created by a Congress driven by conflicting ideology, now threatening to plunge the country into recession.  Instead of engaging in practical and meaningful negotiations, the rhetoric seems to suggest a quest for domination and the political supremacy that comes with it.  It has the hallmarks of an internecine warfare with little regard that the longer it drags on the greater the suffering of the American people and indeed the rest of the world.  Lost on the elected representatives on both sides is that each day that passes without an agreement the greater is the harm inflicted on the economy with mounting irrecoverable costs.  It is ultimately a timing issue where a solution – any reasonable solution – reached sooner is more desirable than one – even a slightly better one – reached later.

Restoring the Clinton-era tax rates for the rich, in other words letting the Bush tax cuts expire for the top two percent but not for others is somehow completely unacceptable to the GOP.  The alternative – deep spending cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and potentially social security – is not acceptable to the President and his fellow Democrats in Congress.  There is a middle ground that in addition to modest tax increases for the rich and reasonable spending cuts would reduce deductions and close loopholes, but that has so far proved elusive.  The American people voted close to 50-50 for the two parties in the combined presidential, gubernatorial and congressional elections in 2012, but this electoral verdict seems to fall by the wayside in the struggle for supremacy.  Someone on Capitol Hill needs to cry out loud “It’s the economy, stupid.”  Perhaps Congress will then listen.

While the debt and deficit issue, taxes, healthcare and social services are the bone the polarized political classes are quarrelling over, they are in fact symbols of larger issues.  The backbone of the American economy is still strong, but it has changed radically over the last two or three decades.  Emerging economic superpowers, most notably China whose economy is poised to overtake the United States by 2030, can no longer be dismissed as secondary powers.  These realities have contributed to a massive dislocation and with it a loss of confidence in established doctrines.  The consensus that prevailed in the United States from the end of World War II to the 1990s has disintegrated and in the process thrown up a host of would-be-leaders exhorting conflicting remedies for regaining America’s self-esteem and its once unquestioned supreme place in the world.  The GOP is the most afflicted, but the Democrats have also been infected as seen during the 2010 electoral cycle.  The recent election was partly about whether or not Americans were going to accept the philosophies that underpinned the GOP far right.  The voters thought about it and then pulled back.  The GOP’s embrace of the Tea Party movement has cost it dearly.  It will therefore take some time for the party itself to heal and develop a new ‘narrative’ that it can truly believe in and can convince the voters.

Meanwhile, the ranks of millionaires – high net worth individuals (HNWI) – will diminish no matter what happens.  A recent study by Wealth Insight has concluded that the impasse – tiptoeing around the cliff or eventually falling over – will ultimately lead to a smaller number of millionaires.  Conversely, if either party had won decisively, in other words if the threat of the fiscal cliff had been mitigated, millionaires would be considerably more numerous.  One wonders how high the number of people below the poverty line will swell before the rhetoric ends and there is finally some decisive action!

Fazley Siddiq

Professor of Economics
School of Public Administration
Dalhousie University

Fulbright Visiting Research Chair in Canada-U.S. Relations
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

Fellow, Taubman Center for State and Local Government
John. F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
Fazley_Siddiq@hks.harvard.edu

Tel: 202-691-4358 (Wilson Center office)

Posted in Fulbright | Leave a comment

Katy Arnett – Meeting the Diverse Needs of Learners

Katy Arnett is an Associate Professor of Educational Studies at SMCM and is also currently serving as Acting Department Chair/Director of Teacher Education.  Both her M.A. and Ph.D. are in Second Language Education, from the University of Toronto.  A former high school French teacher, she now works with teachers of French Second Language (FSL) in Canada as they work to support students with disabilities in their classes and K-12 content teachers in both the U.S. and Canada as they work to meet the needs of the rising population of English Language Learners.
____________________________________________________________

International Education Week emphasises the benefits of international education and exchange worldwide. Exchange programs encourage scholars, from a variety of fields of study, to spend either a semester or an academic year abroad. In terms of education, international cooperation on education contributes to education reform and education solutions. Fulbright Canada, only one country among over 155 where the Fulbright program operates, has seen 86 scholars in education embark on an academic residential exchange. This year, Dr. Katy Arnett is one of those scholars who believe that education is an important and rewarding field.

Dr. Katy Arnett is an associate professor of Educational Studies at St. Mary’s College of Maryland, and is currently on her Fulbright Scholar Award at the University of New Brunswick conducting research on learner diversity, inclusion, and second language development. “The idea of accommodating a wide range of learner needs and learning styles within a particular class has been a fundamental problem in second language courses,” says Katy. She has recently published a professional learning text, which draws on both her research and teaching experience related to supporting students with diverse learning needs. As she shares in the introduction to the text, “This book is essentially about moving forward, about figuring out how to channel the creativity of [second/foreign language] teachers into the challenge of meeting the diverse needs of learners.” The book also seeks to change the way in which teachers have been supported in their quest to be inclusive educators, by offering a research-grounded “phased” approach to inclusive teaching that moves beyond strategy suggestions and into activity structures and lesson design elements that are consonant with the goals of second language education.

Dr. Arnett began her educational exchange in September 2012. She chose to go to New Brunswick, the only officially bilingual province in Canada, to enable inquiries in the two realms of second language education in which she works:  support of students with diverse learning needs in French Second Language programs, and support for newcomers in their quest to learn English as an Additional Language. In learning more about the educational experiences of these student populations, the goal is to help “pinpoint needed focus points for teacher education and ways in which diverse learning needs are supported” says Katy.

In an interview with Fulbright Canada, Katy was asked how her research will influence her personal experiences and the ways in which she teaches second language education.

“The English as an Additional Language (EAL) program in which I’ve been working in as a participant-observer consists of late adolescent newcomers (17-22) to Canada. The program is a grass-roots solution to a growing challenge in New Brunswick—how can we help students on the cusp of adulthood get the language and job-readiness skills they need to access the best next steps for their lives and maximize their contribution to Canadian life?  Working with this program has inspired me to explore the potential for a similar solution in the U.S; I know from my collaboration with schools in the U.S. that newcomers arriving at 16 or older face a very daunting challenge to get the credentials they need to move on in education and get access to the kinds of job expected in our new economy—and we lose a lot of these students before they even actually start school because the challenge is so great. What I’ve learned already from this program has given me ideas for trying to shake up that status quo.”

In reflecting on International Education Week, Katy was asked why she thinks international exchange is important for research development in education.

“In all cultures, there is teaching and there is learning; education comes in many forms. In learning how a different culture structures its educational experience, while at the same time gaining a bit of distance from your own, it can sometimes become easier to approach a challenge within your education system and propose solutions that benefit the learners.  For both the EAL and FSL strands of what I do, I structure my research to enable refinements in practice, not because what is happening is necessarily wrong, but because what is happening can be always be better.”

Dr. Arnett’s book, “Languages for All” is officially released by Pearson Education Canada and is available for sale, for more details click here.

Posted in Fulbright, Teachers | Comments Off

American Wealth, Power, Poverty and Inequality: Glimpses of Election Day through the Eyes of a Visitor

Dr. Fazley Kader Siddiq, Fulbright Visiting Research Chair in Canada-U.S. Relations, at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

On the evening of Tuesday, November 6, as I came down the elevator from my office in the Wilson Center heading towards the exit, I walked straight into a lavish party at the atrium of the Reagan Building. The Republican National Committee had booked the space to celebrate election night. Finishing touches were being applied to the decorations and the lighting, and elaborate food and beverage tables had been set up by uniformed servers. The sound system and other equipment to be used by the musicians and the speakers, that included House Speaker John Boehner, had been carefully arranged. Television monitors hung on the wall. It was an opulent sight, but not lacking in taste. Before long a stream of smartly dressed men and women in fashionable attire and stylish footwear began to come through the security doors and proceed towards the atrium, eventually filling the amphitheatre. The atmosphere was vibrant yet one of suppressed anticipation. Several people stopped to talk. One was a PBS reporter; another was a woman from Staten Island. As I walked past the registration desk, a tall and elegant young man said smilingly that he hoped I was getting ready to celebrate a Romney win. I told him that I was a visitor to the country, but I was looking forward to celebrating the election results no matter who the winner.

The part of Washington, DC where the US government is located symbolizes wealth and power like no other capital in the world. The government buildings, museums and memorials are stately, the architecture refined and the people going about their daily business confident and, for the most part, prosperous. There is no visible sign of the difficult fiscal and budgetary situation facing the country or of the crippling political polarization threatening further economic setbacks. It is an attractive place to go to work every day and enjoy the opportunity to walk on wide sidewalks around city blocks over the lunch hour.

As a Canadian on a nine‐month research assignment in Washington, DC, the 2012 election was memorable. This was the first time I was in the United States on election day. The excitement was natural. The bruising campaign leading up to the election was exhausting, the ideological gulf between the two parties wide; hence the solutions put forward to address the nation’s problems vastly different. Opinion polls were predicting a close election, which added to the excitement. Being a visitor, but one quite interested in American politics, I was determined to enjoy it to the full extent and celebrate the outcome no matter who the winners or losers. It would be yet another celebration of democracy in this great country with its rich democratic tradition and of the American people exercising their democratic right with enthusiasm. The storm of a week ago, however, that created such misery along much of the eastern seaboard had dampened the mood somewhat, especially for those still without power. As a researcher in this country and a curious observer, I had the luxury of sitting back and watching the American people decide who they were going to vote for and why. Each had their own reason for choosing one party over another or one candidate over another. They were voting for candidates at the local, state and federal levels and for an eclectic collection of other issues ranging in some states from legalization of recreational marijuana to marriage equality. It was all very complicated, time‐consuming and rather intense, a reflection not just of American democracy in action, but of decisions that were to be made by the electorate for a host of social and policy issues. One can only wish that a clever way could be devised to dodge the impending fiscal cliff through such a process!

After the usual Tuesday meeting with my research intern, I walked over to the Martin Luther King Library after lunch, a 15 to 20‐minute walk from the Reagan Building. I wanted to see the actual polling and this was a polling center that was close by. At the entrance, I was asked if I had come to vote and when I said I was not a voter, the young man still let me through thinking that I probably wanted to use the library. I took advantage of this opportunity to get a library card and then waded through the polling lines of patient voters to read the daily newspapers at the far end of the library. The atmosphere was an entirely different one from where I work. Most of the people lined up to vote inside the library and the pedestrians walking around outside seemed visibly poor as did the street vendors selling an assortment of gloves, mittens and scarves. The appearance on their faces, their clothing, shoes, their whole demeanor revealed unambiguously their lower income level and social status. It is not that I had not seen
poor people in such large numbers before. I grew up in a poor Asian country where conditions are a lot worse and where a majority of the people are desperately poor. But this is not a poor Asian country nor is it a community in a country in Central or South America, far away from the wealth and power of the American capital. It is just a stone’s throw from the White House and the Capitol, symbols of America’s power and influence that reach the farthest corners of the world. This is the city where decisions are made that affect not just the lives and wellbeing of Americans, but much of the rest of the world. It is the city where leaders of nations rich and poor, strong and weak, come to ask for favors or plead their case. And yet a large proportion of the American people living in the heart of the capital seem to be untouched by the wealth and glory of their own nation. The American pie is unquestionably large even in these difficult times, but the share received by some is pitifully small, casting a shadow on the wealth and grandeur that defines much of America. At that moment, the election results seemed irrelevant because no matter who won the presidency or which party controlled the House or
the Senate, the lives of these people with their tiny share of the national pie was not about to change.

The election had been all but called anyway during the weekend. Networks, Fox TV excepted, analysts like the unerring Drew Linzer of Emory University, Sam Wang of Princeton and Nate Silver of the New York Times, and political pundits, save for the likes of George Will, were giving not just the electoral college, but also the popular vote to President Obama with the status quo extending to both the House and the Senate. Whatever the outcome, neither the lives of the Washington elite nor the rest of the population in the nation’s capital were likely to change over the next four years. The people wrapped in blankets outside metro train stations on cool November nights seemingly oblivious of their surroundings as commuters return home will probably continue to live in much the same manner as well. Here again the status quo will likely remain as is!

Fazley Siddiq

Professor of Economics
School of Public Administration
Dalhousie University

http://management.dal.ca/People%20and%20Groups/Faculty/Profile.php?id=52

Fulbright Visiting Research Chair in Canada-U.S. Relations
Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars

http://www.wilsoncenter.org/staff/fazley-siddiq

Fellow, Taubman Center for State and Local Government
John. F. Kennedy School of Government
Harvard University
Tel: 202-691-4358 (Wilson Center office)

Posted in Fulbright, Teachers | Leave a comment

U.S. Ambassador discusses the U.S. Elections at the Munk School

As the world’s attention is focused on the Presidential Election in the United States, David Jacobson, the U.S. Ambassador to Canada, was at the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto to discuss the election, and its implications for Canada.  On Tuesday, October 23, the Munk School and Fulbright Canada presented a public lecture featuring Ambassador David Jacobson, who delivered a lecture entitled, “The U.S. Elections: An Insider’s View from the Outside”.

A recorded webcast of the lecture can be found on the Munk School’s website.

Posted in Fulbright, Press, Videos | Comments Off

A Killam Journey

Rebecca Cohn (2012-2013) Killam Fellow at the National War Museum at Orientation in Ottawa

The Killam Fellowships program will be offering me a fantastic opportunity to experience academic life at the University of Washington in Seattle, where I will be studying beginning in January 2013. I am looking forward to being able to truly experience all that Seattle has to offer, not just as a visiting tourist, but as a full-time student.

While on exchange, I will have the opportunity to apply for a travel grant through Fulbright Canada’s Mobility Program. I cannot wait to further explore the United States, to meet new people and to absorb the culture of the American way of life, as well as to share my Canadian culture with others. With a goal to study medicine, I am especially excited to be studying at the University of Washington, a leading research institution, where I will be able to attend presentations by leading researchers in their fields, something I would never have been able to experience otherwise.

Over the years, whether through volunteer work, university or extracurricular activities, I have met several fascinating individuals who have made an impact on my life. By far, my most meaningful memories are those that centre on those people with whom I have built connections and shared experiences. This is what is at the heart of this program and what I am most excited about discovering on my exchange in the United States.

_ Rebecca Cohn 2012-2013 Killam Fellow
From McGill University to the University of Washington

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Watch Robert Barsky Deliver the 10th Annual Killam Lecture

Posted in Fulbright, Killam, Press | Comments Off

The U.S. Elections – An Insider’s View from the Outside

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Killam Day of Action

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off

Fulbright Scholar named Action Canada Fellow

Fulbright Canada alumna Annie Sabourin (1999-2000) was recently awarded a 2012-13 Action Canada Fellowship. Action Canada is the only Canadian fellowship that combines leadership development and cross-country conferences to allow fellows to explore public policy choices for Canada`s future.  Fellows are chosen from all sectors, including business, science, government, academia and the professional fields.

Born on Montreal’s south shore, Annie Sabourin is the Institutional Relations Advisor in the office of the rector of Université de Montréal, Quebec’s largest university. Previously, she was a senior analyst at the Montreal Board of Trade, working on issues of economic development, international affairs, public finance, and culture.

In 1999, Annie completed a bachelor of arts degree in Political Science and East-Asian Studies at Université de Montréal. She received a Fulbright Canada award to study international relations and economics at the Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). During her studies, Annie focused on Canada and US cooperation in foreign policy towards China, and worked for six months at the Canadian embassy in Beijing.

Annie is passionate about Canada’s plan to increase long-term prosperity through innovation and the continuous improvement of human capital. She believes in increasing support to keep youth in school and enhancing accessibility to post-secondary education. She contributes to the development of her community as a member of the executive committee of the board of directors of Collège Édouard-Montpetit.

Annie lives in Montreal with her husband and daughter.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dispatches from a G8 Student Researcher

Mahdi Hussein, 2011-12 Killam Fellow

The G8 Research Group is a research group with the Munk School of Global Affairs at the University of Toronto. Its mission is to serve as a leading independent source of information, analysis, and research on the institutions, issues and members of the G8 Summit. I first started as a research analyst within the Civil Society Department in the beginning of my second year of university; and now, I alongside one of my colleagues, serve as the lead analysts for the department. We explore the role civil society actors’ play in creating the commitments the G8 enacts on a yearly basis. We research their policy recommendations and gage their reactions to past and future commitments. It is extremely interesting as you get to interact with civil society actors representing a diverse set of causes: poverty eradiation, environmental preservation, child and human rights, developmental non-governmental organizations etc. Through our publications, we are able to hear first-hand from those at the front lines, as well as have access to those with the ability to make the necessary policy changes to accommodate these groups.

The greatest challenge our group and I consistently encounter is the access to information on a timely manner. The G8 Summit occurs over a few days once a year, and civil society groups and government institutions release information tailored to the summit right before the summits begin and when they conclude. This leaves us with the task of diligently combing through information throughout the year seeking and analysing issues that we believe will be of significance at the summit. We are able to do this effectively with the help of a number of highly intelligent student researchers, supporting academic faculty members, and our contacts in the field. This work has allowed me to interact with representatives from organizations from around the globe, learn in-depth about the global problems we face, and the policy recommendations that we can propose to make it better.

-by Mahdi Hussein, 2011-12 Killam Student

 

Posted in Alumni, Killam, students | Leave a comment

Fulbright scholar publishes comparable research on families

Doing comparable research on families in two fundamentally different circumstances: My recently published Canada/U.S. Fulbright research.

People who are married live much longer than those who remain single or divorce, but understanding why is complicated. On the one hand, there are a number of potential benefits that families provide: there are social benefits in having a confidant and in being introduced to a new set of friends; economic reasons in that partners often share resources such as money or housing; and even health benefits, because individuals act healthier and take better care of themselves when they have partners. However, people who find partners are different from those who do not: people are more likely to find partners if they are more educated, have (better paying) jobs, are healthier, and act healthier.

While selection criteria for partnerships are well known and tend to be relatively universal, researchers find different results depending on the country they study: studies in the U.S. tended first to focus on marriage, and found that selection was extremely important, while studies in countries like the United Kingdom tended to find stronger benefits and more cohabitation. I used my Fulbright year to help understand how Canada and the United States differed to help contextualize these differences.

There are substantial differences in the importance of families: in the United States, individuals are not provided benefits, rather benefits are conferred upon a subset of working individuals and their families, as well as to poor people who do not work. Families in the U.S. are also much more likely to go bankrupt due to health problems, even when they have health insurance and work in relatively stable jobs: if people become too sick to work, they lose their jobs and often their benefits, they then cannot pay for treatment, or insurance premiums, and go bankrupt. In this sense, the stakes involved in creating healthy families is substantially higher in the U.S. than in Canada.

Putting this into practice, I used two large and comparable longitudinal datasets and cutting-edge longitudinal methodology to study individuals starting partnerships between ages 18 and 50 in Canada and the U.S. What I found was that in Canada, individuals largely found partners irrespective of health, and became healthier after entering into partnership. In the U.S., in contrast, individuals who entered into partnerships were much healthier than other singles prior to partnership, and did not become healthier afterwards.

For a long time, Epidemiologists have argued that a range of social and economic policies can have substantial health effects. This can be because they change the benefits from a treatment or a condition, and it can also be because policy changes the incentives involved in doing things like getting jobs, becoming a parent, or finding a partner. In this context, policy makers have “defamilialized” a number of forms of economic risk in Canada: the Canadian government has put in place things to protect all individuals (and implicitly their families) from experiencing severe economic problems when they get sick. This is not true in the United States, which has real implications for families, the benefits that they offer and the stakes that are involved in creating a family.

My supervisor and I have recently published this research in the Health Economics section of Social Science and Medicine under the title “The role of defamilialization in the relationship between partnership and self-rated health: A cross-national comparison of Canada and the United States.” You can find the article online using the following link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.05.034.

_Sean Clouston 2008-2009 Fulbright Scholar

Posted in Alumni, Fulbright, students | Leave a comment